Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix refinance target protocol selection and flow issues #4036

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

piotrwitek
Copy link
Contributor

@piotrwitek piotrwitek commented Sep 27, 2024

This pull request addresses issues with the default protocol selection for refinancing, ensuring that the correct protocol is chosen based on the lending protocol. Additionally, it refactors the refinance flow for improved visibility and clarity. The changes enhance the overall user experience by streamlining the refinancing process.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified logic for protocol filtering in the refinance product table.
    • Improved conditions for displaying the primary button in the refinance sidebar.
  • Refactor

    • Enhanced readability by extracting button properties in the refinance form view.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted conditions for transaction execution based on lending protocol.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to several components in the refinance feature of the application. Key updates include simplifying the protocol filter logic in the RefinanceProductTableStep, refining the condition for hiding the primary button in the sidebar, adjusting the destructuring in the useSdkTransaction hook, and refactoring the primaryButton configuration in the RefinanceFormView. These adjustments aim to enhance code readability and streamline control flow without altering the overall functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
features/refinance/components/steps/RefinanceProductTableStep.tsx Simplified the initialFilters logic for the protocol filter by setting it to contain LendingProtocol.AaveV3 only when lendingProtocol is LendingProtocol.SparkV3, otherwise it is set to an empty array.
features/refinance/helpers/getRefinanceSidebarButtonStatus.ts Removed double negation in the condition for hiding the primary button, simplifying the logic to directly evaluate (walletAddress && !isOwner).
features/refinance/hooks/useSdkTransaction.tsx Removed several destructured properties from context in useSdkRefinanceTransaction, updated the conditional check in the useEffect hook to include lendingProtocol, and modified the dependency array accordingly.
features/refinance/views/RefinanceFormView.tsx Refactored the primaryButton property in sidebarSectionProps by extracting its definition into a separate constant, improving code organization without changing functionality.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the code we hop and play,
With filters clearer, come what may.
Buttons now shine bright and true,
Refactoring brings a joyful view.
So let’s refine and celebrate,
A simpler path, oh what a fate! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
features/refinance/helpers/getRefinanceSidebarButtonStatus.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-63: Consider similar simplifications throughout the function

While the change on line 50 is good, it might be worth reviewing the rest of the function for similar opportunities to simplify boolean expressions. For example, the isPrimaryButtonDisabled and isPrimaryButtonLoading calculations also use !!walletAddress. Consider if these can be simplified in a similar manner to improve overall code consistency and readability.

features/refinance/components/steps/RefinanceProductTableStep.tsx (1)

95-95: Approve the simplified protocol selection logic with a minor suggestion.

The change effectively addresses the PR objective of fixing the refinance target protocol selection. It ensures that AaveV3 is only considered for refinancing when the current lending protocol is SparkV3, which aligns with the intended behavior.

To further improve code clarity, consider using an object literal for more explicit protocol mapping:

protocol: {
  [LendingProtocol.SparkV3]: [LendingProtocol.AaveV3],
}[lendingProtocol] || [],

This approach would make it easier to add more protocol mappings in the future if needed.

features/refinance/views/RefinanceFormView.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-214: Consider further refactoring for improved maintainability

While the current changes are beneficial, the RefinanceFormView component is quite large and complex. For future improvements, consider:

  1. Splitting the component into smaller, more focused sub-components to improve readability and maintainability.
  2. Extracting some of the complex logic into custom hooks or memoized functions. This could potentially improve performance and make the code easier to test and maintain.
  3. Using the useMemo hook for computationally expensive derived values to optimize performance.

These suggestions are not urgent but could be beneficial for long-term maintainability of the codebase.

features/refinance/hooks/useSdkTransaction.tsx (1)

90-90: Consider removing sdk from the dependency array

Since sdk is created using useMemo with an empty dependency array (useMemo(() => makeSDK({ apiURL: '/api/sdk' }), [])), it remains constant throughout the component's lifecycle. Including sdk in the dependency array might be unnecessary and could be omitted to simplify the dependencies.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2cc96cc and d870157.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • features/refinance/components/steps/RefinanceProductTableStep.tsx (1 hunks)
  • features/refinance/helpers/getRefinanceSidebarButtonStatus.ts (1 hunks)
  • features/refinance/hooks/useSdkTransaction.tsx (3 hunks)
  • features/refinance/views/RefinanceFormView.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
features/refinance/helpers/getRefinanceSidebarButtonStatus.ts (1)

50-50: Approved: Simplified boolean expression

The removal of the double negation (!!) from the condition is a good simplification. The expression (walletAddress && !isOwner) already evaluates to a boolean, making the !! unnecessary. This change improves code readability without altering the logic.

features/refinance/views/RefinanceFormView.tsx (1)

179-186: Excellent refactoring of the primaryButton object!

The extraction of the primaryButton object from sidebarSectionProps is a great improvement. This refactoring enhances code readability and maintainability by:

  1. Reducing the complexity of the sidebarSectionProps object.
  2. Improving the organization of the code by grouping related properties.
  3. Making it easier to modify or extend the primaryButton configuration in the future.

The changes are well-implemented and do not alter the component's functionality.

Also applies to: 191-191

features/refinance/hooks/useSdkTransaction.tsx (3)

21-24: Updated destructuring enhances code clarity

The destructuring of environment, position, and form now includes only the necessary properties: chainInfo, address, lendingProtocol, and dpm. This change removes unused variables, streamlining the code and improving readability.


40-44: Verify conditional logic for protocol-specific simulations

The updated conditional in the useEffect hook introduces a check for the Maker protocol:

if (
  !dpm?.address ||
  refinanceSimulation == null ||
  (lendingProtocol === LendingProtocol.Maker && importPositionSimulation == null)
) {
  return
}

Please ensure that this logic correctly handles all lending protocols, and that importPositionSimulation is only required when lendingProtocol === LendingProtocol.Maker. This verification will confirm that the refinancing flow works as intended across different protocols.


90-90: Confirm completeness of dependency array in useEffect hook

The addition of lendingProtocol to the dependency array is appropriate since it's used within the useEffect hook. Ensure that all variables referenced within the hook, such as sdk, dpm?.address, address, chainInfo, importPositionSimulation, and refinanceSimulation, are included to prevent stale closures and ensure consistent behavior.

@piotrwitek piotrwitek merged commit 3bab84e into dev Sep 27, 2024
26 checks passed
@piotrwitek piotrwitek deleted the pw/fix-refinance-maker-issues branch September 27, 2024 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants